I cannot believe this. An American mother is on the run because a court has ordered that her son should receive chemotherapy for Hodgkins Lymphoma, and she does not want it for him. I don't know the background to this story, or what her real motivation might be, but regardless: it is time that the medical profession wakes up to the fact that chemotherapy is a blunt instrument that treats cancer as a symptom and ignores the causes. I find it astonishing that so much has been achieved in the field of medicine, and yet cancer patients routinely receive a form of treatment that is intended to go as far as it can in destroying human cells, while stopping just short of killing the patient. This is barbaric.
Joshua's treatment by the hospital haematology department ended because chemo had destroyed the ability of his body to protect and heal itself, and any further treatment would have taken him over the edge. His official cause of death was renal failure, which means that the chemo caused kidney damage so that waste could no longer be filtered out of the blood. The implication, in effect, is that by agreeing to chemotherapy as a strategy to kill cancer cells, we were committed to a path of no return. If the chemo did not work, the body's immune system and vital organs would be so compromised as to prevent recovery from the damage caused by the chemo - and that is exactly what happened to Josh. Our efforts to help him, during and after chemo, were focused on strengthening his immune system, his mind and his spirit so that his body would have as much as possible at its disposal in fighting both the cancer and the collateral damage caused by the chemo. But this was not enough.
It would be pointless to speculate on what might have been if we had known more at the start of this journey; but based on what I know now, I think it is ridiculous to force someone to undergo this kind of treatment when - despite decades of effort in cancer research - the mainstream medical profession still does not acknowledge chemotherapy's poor success rate and does not put more effort into studying the role of complementary treatments.
As we have discovered, there are many theories out there. Some of them are clearly crackpot ideas, but there others that seem logical and look promising. Yet in all the reading we did, it was extremely difficult to find authorative research that either supported or debunked the various treatments. Most documentation comes from those promoting the various products, or from independent people who do not have the resources to undertake extensive research that is on a par with that done by mainstream medicine. So we are led to believe that chemo and radiation therapies are the only scientifically justified courses of action, and are effectively forced - as with the American mother - to accept it as the only viable treatment option, when in fact this "scientifically proven" treatment is probably on a par with the mediaeval practice of bloodletting in its rate of success.